Reasons for Impeachment
Former Delhi High Court judge, Justice Yashwant Varma, is under scrutiny for “piles of burnt Rs 500 notes” found at his residence. He has presented five reasons to the Supreme Court to defend himself against possible impeachment.
Questioning the Committee’s Authority
Justice Varma raised concerns about the jurisdiction and power of the in-house committee, led by ex-Chief Justice Sanjiv Kumar, that investigated him. He argued that the committee overlooked important questions that could prove his innocence.
Legal Arguments
He further contended that neither the Chief Justice nor the Supreme Court holds the authority to discipline High Court judges due to constitutional protections.
Committee Composition
The committee examining Justice Varma comprised judges from the Punjab and Haryana High Court, Himachal Pradesh High Court, and Karnataka High Court. However, Justice Varma disputed their ability to recommend his removal.
Flaws in the Process
Justice Varma criticized the investigation for lacking a formal complaint and drawing conclusions without concrete evidence. He emphasized that key questions were ignored, affecting the fairness of the inquiry.
Challenges Faced
He highlighted the denial of a fair hearing and restricted access to evidence, violating principles of natural justice. Justice Varma argued against the release of confidential reports and subsequent damage to his reputation.
Political Involvement
He questioned the authority of the former Chief Justice to recommend his impeachment to the President and the Prime Minister, citing constitutional procedures.
Impeachment Procedures
Despite facing potential impeachment during the upcoming Parliament session, Justice Varma challenges the rushed handling of the situation and the leaking of confidential information.
